EVALUASI PROGRAM PEMBINAAN OLAHRAGA BOLA BASKET PUTRI PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA (PELATDA) PADA PON 2016
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46244/penjaskesrek.v6i1.844Keywords:
Program Evaluation, PON West Java 2016Abstract
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the Program of Sport Basketball of Putri DKI Jakarta (PELATDA) at PON 2016 In West Java. is a qualitative research with evaluation approach using Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model. Data collection methods are triangulated using questionnaires, interviews, and documentation studies. The results showed that: 1) Context Evaluation: its performance has been reached maximally because the division of facilities is good enough but the time is quite late as a barrier. 2) Input Evaluation: The process of recruitment of athlete and trainer in accordance with predetermined criteria, The availability of funds and is in accordance with the use done, but there are delays in disbursement, Availability of facilities and infrastructure, but not meet the standards and needs of athletes, and established communication and good cooperation among relevant stakeholders. 3) Evaluation Process: Planning exercises in accordance with the stipulated in the provisions, the implementation of the exercise goes well and in accordance with the established in the provisions, and Implementation of the evaluation went well. 4) Product Evaluation: Central Jakarta training athletes (PELATDA) are able to achieve the achievements shown through the medal of Silver.
Abstrak
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengevaluasi Program Pembinaan Olahraga Bola Basket Putri Provinsi DKI Jakarta (PELATDA) pada PON 2016 Di Jawa Barat. merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan evaluasi menggunakan model Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP). Metode pengumpulan data secara triangulasi menggunakan kuisioner, wawancara, dan studi dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Evaluasi Context : kinerjanya sudah tercapai secara maksimal karena terbaginya fasilitas yang cukup baik namun waktunya cukup terlambat sebagai penghambat. 2) Evaluasi Input: Proses rekrutmen atlet dan pelatih sesuai dengan kriteria yang telah ditetapkan, Tersedianya dana dan sudah sesuai dengan penggunaan yang dilakukan, namun terjadi keterlambatan dalam pencairan, Tersedianya sarana dan prasarana, namun belum memenuhi standard dan kebutuhan atlet, dan terjalin komunikasi dan kerjasama yang baik antar stakeholder yang terkait. 3) Evaluasi Process: Perencanaan latihan sesuai dengan yang telah ditetapkan pada ketentuan, Pelaksanaan latihan berjalan baik dan sesuai dengan yang telah ditetapkan pada ketentuan, dan Pelaksanaan evaluasi berjalan baik. 4) Evaluasi Product: atlet pemusatan latihan daerah (PELATDA) DKI Jakarta mampu mencapai prestasi yang ditunjukkan melalui perolehan medali PERAK.
Kata Kunci: Evaluasi Program, PON Jawa Barat 2016
References
Davidson. E. Jane. (2005). Evaluation Methodology Basics. United States of America.
Handoko T. Hani, (2011). Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE-YOGYAKARTA
Harsuki. (2012). Pengantar Manajemen Olahraga. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.
Husaini. Usman. (2006). Manajemen Teori, Praktik, dan Riset Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
------------, KONI Provinsi DKI Jakarta. (2009). Surat Keputusan Ketua Umum KONI Provinsi DKI Jakarta
-----------, KONI Provvinsi DKI Jakarta. (2001). Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Pemusatan Latihan Daerah KONI Provinsi DKI Jakarta.
Mardizal, Jonny. (2013). Evaluasi Penerapan Kebijakan Mutu Sekolah Atlet Ragunan DKI Jakarta, Jakarta: PPS UNJ.
Mulyatiningsih, Endang. (2011). Metode Penelitin Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: PT. Alfabeta.
Mutrofin, (2010). Evaluasi Program Teks Pilihan untuk Pemula. Yogyakarta: LaksBang PRESSindo.
Stufflebeam,Daniel L. George F. Madaus , Thomas Kellaghan (ed). (2002). Evaluation Models: Viewpoints in Educational and Human Services Evaluation, Second
Edition, (New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam. Daniel L, Coryn. Chris L. (2014). Evaluation, Theory, Models and Aplications. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass:
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Manajemen.Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wholey, Joseph, Harry T Harry. (2010). Handbook of Practtical Progam Evaluation second edition. San Fransisco: Josey-Bass,.
Winarno, Budi. (2008). Kebijakan Publik: Teori dna Proses. Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Medpress
Yusuf, Farida. (2010). Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Program. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

















