TINGKAT METAKOGNISI MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PGSD PADA PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR INTROVERT-EXTROVERT
Abstract
This research aims to know the knowledge Metacognition of the students program of study learning style PGSD introvert-extrovert on solving math problems and manganalisis the difficulties students with style introvert-extrovert in solving math problems. The type of research used in this research is descriptive qualitative research. The subject is a student of the course learning style PGSD introvert-extrovert. This research uses the learning styles test introvert-extrovert, math problem solving task sheet, and the recording of the live interview. Research results show that the level of Metacognition of the students program of study PGSD STKIP Citra Bakti with learning style introvert are at categories reflective use, where the use of his thoughts both before and after or even during the ongoing process of considering the continuation and improvement of the results of his thoughts, so that students with learning styles is able to complete math problems correctly. While the level of Metacognition of the students program of study PGSD STKIP Citra Bakti with learning styles are extrovert category strategic use and aware use, where the use of his thoughts both before and after or even during a process lasting less considering the continuation and improvement of the results of his thinking, so there is some math problems that are not exactly the result calculation. Therefore, in considering the dosenperlu and associated activities of the learning styles of college students at the time of choosing the method or strategy and the ability of Metacognition is especially related to mathematical problem solving.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengetahuan metakognisi mahasiswa program studi PGSD dengan gaya belajar introvert-extrovert pada pemecahan masalah matematika dan manganalisis kesulitan-kesulitan mahasiswa dengan gaya introvert-extrovert dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Subjek penelitian adalah mahasiswa program studi PGSD dengan gaya belajar introvert-extrovert. Penelitian ini menggunakan tes gaya belajar introvert-extrovert, lembar tugas pemecahan masalah matematika, dan rekaman wawancara langsung.Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa tingkat metakognisi mahasiswa program studi PGSD STKIP Citra Bakti dengan gaya belajar introvert berada pada kategori reflective use, dimana penggunaan pemikirannya baik sebelum dan sesudah atau bahkan selama proses berlangsung mempertimbangkan kelanjutan dan perbaikan hasil pemikirannya, sehingga mahasiswa dengan gaya belajar ini mampu menyelesaikan masalah matematika dengan benar. Sedangkan tingkat metakognisi mahasiswa program studi PGSD STKIP Citra Bakti dengan gaya belajar extrovert berada pada kategori strategic use dan aware use, dimana penggunaan pemikirannya baik sebelum dan sesudah atau bahkan selama proses berlangsung kurang mempertimbangkan kelanjutan dan perbaikan hasil pemikirannya, sehingga ada beberapa masalah matematika yang tidak tepat hasil perhitungannya. Oleh karena itu dalam kegiatan perkuliahan dosenperlu mempertimbangkan gaya belajar mahasiswa pada saat memilih metode atau strategi dan kemampuan metakognisi terutama yang berhubungan dengan pemecahan masalah matematika.
Kata kunci: Metakognitif, Introvert-Extrovert, Masalah Matematika
References
Adebola,S& Sakiru, I. 2012. A Problem Solving Model as a Strategy for Improving Secondary School Students’ Achievement and Retention in Further Mathematics. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology, 2 (2): 122-130.
Beal, Carol R. & Erin Shaw. 2008. Working Memory and Math Problem Solving by Blind Middle and High School Students: Implications for universal access. Proceedings of the19th International Conference of Society for Information Technology and TeacherEducation, Las Vegas, in Press.(Online)
Bednarik, K.& Keinonen,T. 2011. Sixth Graders’ Understanding of Their Own Learning: A Case Study in Environmental Education Course. International Journal of Environmenral & Science Education, 1 (6) : 59-78.
Caliskan, M. & Murat, A. 2001.The effect of Learning Strategies Instruction on Metacognitive Knowledge, Using Metacognitive Skills and Academic Achievement (Primary Education Sixth Grade Turkish Course Sample).Educational Sciences:Theory and Practic,1(11) : 148-153.
Creswell, Jhon W.2012. Educational Research “Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research”.Amerika : Pearson.
Dornyei, Z. 2005. The Psycology of the language Learner: Individual Difference in Second Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah.
Flavell, J.1971. First discussant’s comments: What is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14 p. 277.
Flavell, J 1979. Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring, A new area of Cognitive-Develoopmental Inqury.Stanfor University.
Garner-O, L. & Harrison, S . 2013. An Investigation of the Leaarning Style and Study Habit of Chemistry Undergraduate in Barbados and their Effect ad Predictors of Academic Achiment in Chemical Group Theory. Journal of Education and Social Research, 2 (3) : 107-122.
Hemmat, S.; Jahandar, S. & Khodabandehlou, M. 2014.The Impact of Extroversion VS Introversion on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Ability.IndianJournal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 1 (4) : 119-128.
In’am, A.; Saad, N.& Sazeli, A. 2012. A Metacognitive Approach to Solving Algebra Problems.International Journal of Independent Research and Studies-IJIRS, 4 (1) : 162-173.
Isaacson, R. & Fujita, F. 2006. Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring and Self-Regulated Learning : Academic Succes and Reflections on Learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1 (6) : 39-55.
Kazemi, F.; Reza, M.& Sahar, B. 2010. A Subtle View to Metacognitive Aspect of Mathematical Problem Solving. International Conference on Mathematics Education Research, 8 : 420-426.
Kuzle, A. 2010. Pattern of Metacognitive Behavior During Mathematics Problem-Solving in a Dynamic Geometry Enviroment. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 1 (8) : 20-40.
Landi, M.A.G. (2009). Helping Students with Learning Disabilities Make Sense of Word Problems. Intervention in School and Clinic, 37(1), 13 – 18.
Laurens, T. 2009. PenjenjanganMetakognisi Siswa. Disertasi Pascasarjana Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika UNESA: Tidak dipublikasikan.
Malone, L.K. 2007. The Convergence of Knowledge Organization, Problem-Solving Behavior, and Metacognition Research with The Modeling Method of Physics Instruction Part II. Journal Physics Teacher Education.
NCTM. 2000. Principle and Standard for school Mathematics. Reston: The National Council of Tecaher Mathematics.
Ozsoy, G.& Ataman, A. 2009.The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Training on Mathematical Problem Solving Achievement. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2 (1) : 67-82.
Polya, G. 1973. How To Solve It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sajirman, P. 2002. Kemampuan Mahasiswa PGSD dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-soal Matematika SD.Jurnal
Cakrawala Pendidikan, 21(3): 357 -376.
Sahar, B. & Rohani, A. 2010.Assessing Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies during Algebra Problem Solving Among University Students.International Conference on Mathematics Education Research, 8 : 403-410.
Schneidher, W. (2010).Metacognition, Strategic Use & Instruction. Dalam H.S. Waters & W. Schneidher (Eds), Metacognition and Memory Development in Childhold and Adolescence (pp. 54 – 81). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Schraw, G & Dennison, R. S. 1994. Assesing Metacognitive Awareness.Contempory Educational Psychology, 19: 460 475.
Soedjadi, R. 2000. Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia (Konstatatsi Keadaan Masa Kini Menuju Harapan Masa Depan). Jakarta: PPTA, DJPT.
Topcu , A. & Ubuz, B. 2008. The Effects Of Metakognitie Knowledge On The Pre-Service Teachers, Participation In The Asynchronous Online Forum. Educational Technology & Society.
Wells, Adrian. 2010. Metacognitive Therapy for Anxiety and Depression. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Book Reviews, 6 (1): 1–3.
Abstract views: 287
PDF downloads: 345
