PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF, MOTIVASI, DAN AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA PADA KONSEP EKOSISTEM DI MTSN MODEL BANDA ACEH
Abstract
This research was aimed to know the differences of cognitive learning outcomes, motivation, student learning activity in the implementation of cooperative learning model of STAD type and conventional learning, and the relation between motivation and student learning activity towards cognitive learning outcomes in the implementation of cooperative learning model of STAD type. The method in this research used was quasi experiment. The population in this research was all of seventh grade students of MTsN Model Banda Aceh totaling 396 students from 11 classrooms. Sampling was done with random sampling technique. The research instrument was used cognitive learning outcomes test, student motivation questionnaire, and observation sheet student learning activity. Data analysis was used t test and multiple correlation test at significance level of 0.05. The cognitive learning outcomes obtained tcount = 2.18. Students motivation obtained tcount = 4.05. Student learning activity obtained tcount = 17.25. This means there are the differences of cognitive learning outcomes, student motivation, student learning activity in both classes. The relation between motivation and student learning activity towards cognitive learning outcomes obtained R = 0.56 which means it has enough relation. The conclusion of this research is there are differences in cognitive learning outcomes, motivation, of student learning activity in the implementation of cooperative learning model of STAD type and conventional learning, and there is a relation between motivation and student learning activity towards cognitive learning outcomes in the implementation of cooperative learning model STAD type. As an effort to improve cognitive learning outcomes, motivation and of student learning activity optimally, it is expected that biology teachers can apply the cooperative learning model of STAD type that anable students to engage actively in the learning process.
Downloads
References
Asma, N. (2006). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Direktorat Ketenagaan.
Aunurrahman. (2012). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta
Azhari, S. (2009). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kooperatif tipe STAD Disertai dengan Membuat Ringkasan Berformat Mini-Magz dan Minat Belajar Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Biologi pada Materi Pelajaran Ekosistem. Tesis. UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.
Gonzales, P. (2009). Highlights From TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Fourthand Eighth-Grade Students in an International Context. Washington: National Center for Education Statistics.http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009001.pdf. Diakses pada tanggal 5 Juni 2012.
Hamalik, O . (2005). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta. PT. Bumi Aksara.
Harjono. (2010). Meningkatkan Kompetensi Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif STAD. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 27 (1): 7-14.
Hartono., dan Nugroho. (2009). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Berorientasi Keterampilam Proses. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 5 (2): 108-112.
Ibrahim, M., Rachmadiarti, F., Nur, M., dan Ismono. (2000). Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya: University Press.
Laka. L. (2011). Penerapan Model Cooperative Learning Tipe STAD sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Insan, 13 (1): 41-49.
Nina. H., Fatimah dan Zainul, A. (2012). Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran PKN pada Materi Persamaan Kedudukan Warga Negara dengan Model Pemblajaran Student Teams-Achievement Division di Kelas X-II SMA PGRI 4 Banjarmasin. Jurnal Insan, 2 (4): 1-13
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Smith, T.A., Garden, R.A., Gregory, K.D., Gonzalez, E.J., Chrostowski, S..J, and Connor. (1999). International Report: Finding from IEA’s Repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eight Grade (TIMSS). Boston: ISC. Diakses pada tanggal 2 mei 2012.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Smith, T.A.,Garden, R.A., Gregory, K.D., Gonzalez, E.J., Chrostowski, S..J, and Connor. (2003). International Report: Finding from IEA’s Repeat of the Third). Boston: ISC. Diakses pada tanggal 2 mei 2012.
Musfiqon. (2012). Pengembangan Media & Sumber Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakaraya.
Nasution. S. (2004). Didaktik Asas-Asas Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
OECD. (2003). Learning for Tomorrows World-First Results from PISA 2000. http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd /1/60/34002216.pdf. Diakses pada tanggal 2 juni 2012.
-----------. (2004). Learning for Tomorrows World-First Results from PISA 2003. http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd /1/60/34002216.pdf. Diakses pada tanggal 3 Juni 2012.
-----------. (2007). Executive Summary PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’sbWorld.mhttp://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2006/39725224.pdf. Diakses pada tanggal 1 Juni 2012.
Prasetya, J. T. dan Ahmadi. A. (2005). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Pujiati, I. (2008), Peningkatan Motivasi dan Ketuntasan Belajar Matematika Melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD. Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 1 (1): 1-20.
Rohani, A. (2004). Pengelolaan Pengajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Rusman. (2010). Model-model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana
Sardiman, A. M. (2008). Interaksi dan Motivasi Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Shaleh, A. R. (2004). Madrasah dan Pendidikan Anak Bangsa. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rusyda. S. (2009). Pengaruh Motivasi dan Aktivitas Siswa terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 38 Semarang pada Materi Segi Empat dengan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TGT (Team Games Tournament). Tesis. PPs Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Sinulinga., dan Nadeak. J. (2012). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Berbasis Mind Mapping terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Konsep Bunyi di Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Tebing Tinggi. Jurnal Online Pendidikan Fisika, 1 (1): 37-48.
Slavin, R, E. (1995). Cooperative Learning, Theory, Research, and Practice. Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Sudjana, N. (2005). Dasar-Dasar Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru.
Sugianto. (2012). Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Ekosistem dengan Lingkungan Sebagai Sumber Belajar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) DI SMP Negeri 7 Tanjung Selor.Kalimantan Timur. Pensa E-jurnal, 2 (1): 101-114.
Suprijono, A. (2009). Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Uno, H. B. (2008). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Van, W. M. (2012). The Effects of the STAD-Cooperative Learning Method on Student Achievement, Attitude and Motivation in Economics Education. Journal of Social Science, 33(2): 261-270.
Zakaria. E., Lu C. C., and Yusoff. D. (2010). The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students Mathematics Achievement and Attitude towards Mathematics. Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (2): 272-275.
Zulfiani. (2012). Perbedaan Hasil belajar kognitif Siswa Antara Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD dengan Metode Ekspositori pada Konsep Ekosistem Terintegrasi Nilai: Penelitian Quasi Eksperimen di SMA At Taqwa Tangerang. Skripsi: Tanggerang
Abstract views: 2630
PDF downloads: 2903
