ANALYZING FRAME STORIES IN A PILOT STUDY OF EMPATHY-BASED STORIES TO IMPLEMENT IN INDONESIAN ELT CONTEXT
Abstract
Penelitian ini menyelidiki keakuratan dan keefektifan penggunaan kerangka cerita dalam sebuah uji pilot yang akan diimplementasikan pada penelitian-penelitian selanjutnya. Dengan menggunakan Metode Cerita Berbasis Empati (MEBS), enam partisipan berpartisipasi dalam merangkai kerangka cerita positif dan negative melalui Google Forms. Penulis menggunakan metode observasi untuk menilai efektivitas kerangka cerita. Penulis juga menyertakan hasil penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya dan mencari validasi profesional untuk meningkatkan keandalan penelitian. Temuan penelitian ini menyoroti beberapa faktor yang perlu dipertimbangkan ketika mengintegrasikan kerangka cerita ke dalam penelitian MEBS di masa depan. Penelitian in mengungkapkan bahwa integrasi MEBS yang efektif dalam penelitian di masa depan membutuhkan pelaksanaan uji pilot untuk memastikan pengembangan kerangka cerita yang dirancang dengan baik. Selain itu, penyediaan lembar persetujuan penelitian terbukti secara signifikan meningkatkan otonomi partisipan untuk terlibat dalam kerangka cerita. Sementara itu, penggunaan instruksi dan kebebasan untuk menulis kerangka cerita dalam bahasa pertama, bersamaan dengan penjelasan berbasis video berdurasi 5 menit terbukti meningkatkan pemahaman dan keterlibatan partisipan dalam menulis bingkai cerita. Penelitian ini menyarankan untuk mendiversifikasi metode pengumpulan data selain Google Formulir, termasuk email dan media sosial, untuk memastikan temuan hasil penelitian dapat diterapkan di berbagai konteks.
Asbtract
This study investigated the accuracy and effectiveness of employing frame stories in a pilot study to be implemented in future studies. Employing the Method of Empathy-based Stories (MEBS), six participants participated in constructing positive and negative frame stories through Google Forms. The writers used the observation method to assess the effectiveness of frame stories. The writers also included the results of previous studies and sought professional validation to enhance the study's reliability. The study's findings highlighted several factors that needed to be taken into account when integrating frame stories into future MEBS research. The study reveals that the effective integration of MEBS in future research requires the conduction of pilot studies to ensure the development of well-designed frame stories. Providing informed consent was found to significantly boost participants' autonomy in engaging with the frame story. Additionally, the use of instruction and freedom to write frame stories in first language, alongside with 5-minute video-based explanations was shown to enhance participants understanding and engagement in writing the frame stories. The study suggests diversifying data collection methods beyond Google Forms, including email and social media, to ensure the findings are applicable across diverse contexts.
Downloads
References
Alzahrani, T. (2019). Investigating Translanguaging Practices and Attitudes of International Students in Higher Education at an American University. Arab World English Journal, 1(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/elt1.9
Bree, R., & Gallagher, G. (2016). Using Microsoft Excel to Code and Thematically Analyse Qualitative Data: A Simple, Cost-Effective Approach. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 2811–28114.
Brinton, L. (2020). Here’s Why Employees Need to Be Well-Informed. The Washington Post; WP Company. https://jobs.washingtonpost.com/article/here-s-why-employees-need-to-be-well-informed/
Czarnota-Bojarska, J. (2021). The Ethics of Organizational Research: Methodological Considerations for Ensuring Respondents’ Anonymity and Confidentiality. EWOP in Practice, 15(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.21825/ewopinpractice.87141
Falvo, I., Fiordelli, M., Amati, R., Ibnidris, A., Albanese, E., & Fadda, M. (2021). Participants’ Comprehension of the Informed Consent in an Epidemiological Study on Dementia Prevalence: A Qualitative Study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12(April), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.656822
George, M. S., Gaitonde, R., Davey, R., Mohanty, I., & Upton, P. (2023). Engaging Participants With Research Findings: A Rights-Informed Approach. Health Expectations, 26(2), 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13701
Humphries, B., & Clark, D. (2021). An Examination of Student Preference for Traditional Didactic or Chunking Teaching Strategies in an Online Learning Environment. Research in Learning Technology, 29(1063519), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2405
Kamil, D. (2023). Are They Finely Tuned?: Mapping the Cefr Level of the Reading Texts of the English Textbook for Grade 10 of Indonesian Senior High School. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development, 6(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v6i2.2332
Khidhir, R. J., & Rassul, T. H. (2023). Assessing the Validity of Experts’ Value Judgment over Research Instruments. ZANCO Journal of Humanity Sciences, 27(5), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.27.5.21
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Larson, D. (2020). An Analysis of Research Regarding Video-based Instruction as a Language Learning Tool. The Center for ELF Journal, 109–116. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1390853649818505088
Luna, K., Nogueira, M., & Albuquerque, P. B. (2019). Words in Larger Font Are Perceived as More Important: Explaining the Belief That Font Size Affects Memory. Memory, 27(4), 555–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1529797
Metselaar, S. (2019). Commentary 1: Informed Consent of Research Participants: The Gap between Regulations and Reality. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(5), 433–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619831589a
Parchanda, F. (2021). Role of Behavioristic Marketing and Workplace Diversity in Improved Profitability and Development. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 06(09), 3272–3285.
Perdani, Y. D. (2022). Enhancing the Students’ Grammar Comprehension by Utilizing the Video-based Instruction. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (Vol. 1, Issue 1). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3572549.3572600
Prasodjo, P., & Sally. (2022). The First Freshmen Students’ University Test of English Proficiency: A Descriptive and Correlational Study. Lingual: Journal of Language and Culture, 14(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/LJLC.2022.v14.i02.p01
Särkelä, E., & Suoranta, J. (2020). The Method of Empathy-Based Stories as a Tool for Research and Teaching. Qualitative Report, 25(2), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4124
Schembri, N., & Jahić Jašić, A. (2022). Ethical Issues in Multilingual Research Situations: A Focus on Interview-Based Research. Research Ethics, 18(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221085857
Shamsuzzaman, M. (2015). Perceptions and Practices in Learning and Teaching Second Language Writing in English : Influences of Backgrounds and Language Skills [University of Canterbury]. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26021/9328
Sudheesh, K., Duggappa, D. R., & Nethra, S. S. (2016). How to Write a Research Proposal? Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 60(9), 631–634. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.190617
Sulistyaningrum, S. D., & Purnawati, P. (2021). Incorporating Cefr Bands and Ict-Competences in Grammar Syllabuses of English Language Education Study Program in Indonesia. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 11(2), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v11i2.2863
Thompson, P., Xiu, Y., Tsotsoros, J. D., & Robertson, M. A. (2021). The Effect of Designing and Segmenting Instructional Video. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 20, 173–200. https://doi.org/10.28945/4756
Wahyuni, S., & Umam, M. K. (2017). An Analysis on Writing Anxiety of Indonesian EFL College Learners. JEELS (Journal of Egnlish Education and Linguistics Studies), 4(1), 103–126.
Wallin, A., Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Eskola, J. (2019). The Method of Empathy-Based Stories. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 42(5), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1533937
Wallin, A., Pylväs, L., & Nokelainen, P. (2020). Government Workers’ Stories about Professional Development in a Digitalized Working Life. Vocations and Learning, 13(3), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-020-09248-y
Younas, A., Fàbregues, S., Durante, A., & Ali, P. (2022). Providing English and Native Language Quotes in Qualitative Research: A Call to Action. Nursing Open, 9(1), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1115
Zaki, A. W., & Darmi, R. (2021). CEFR: Education towards 21st Century of Learning. Why Matters? Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 4(2), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.jssh.2021.2.3
Abstract views: 13
PDF downloads: 5
