STUDENT’S ABILITY IN ENGLISH SPEAKING SKILL BY USING PICTURE (A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN MUHAMMADIYAH ISLAMIC SCHOOL AND SMAN 1 SIMEULUE TIMUR)
Abstract
This study is intended to figure out if there is a significant difference in English speaking ability between public school students and Islamic school students. The population of this study is the second year students of both SMAN 1 Simeulue Timur and Muhammadiyah Islamic School Simeulue Timur. The samples of this study were 20 students taken from two classes at SMAN 1 Simeulu Timur and 20 students taken from two classes at Muhammadiyah Islamic School Simeulue Timur. So, the total number of samples from the two schools was 40 students. In collecting the data, the writer gave a picture of 26th December 2004 tsunami in Aceh. The students were asked to describe the picture by their own words. In analyzing the data, the writer used t-test formula to see the significant difference between the students of the two schools in English speaking ability. The mean and standard deviation scores for Muhammadiyah Islamic School Simeulue Timur are 35.25 and 8.20. While the mean and mean and standard deviation scores for SMAN 1 Simeulue Timur are 39 and 8. The result of t-test of the two schools is 13.20. It is considered higher than t value on the table if significance at level 0.05 and 38 for the degree of the freedom which is stated 2.02. The writer concludes that the speaking ability between SMAN 1 Simeulue Timur and Muhammadiyah Islamic School Simeulue Timur is significantly different. Furthermore, the writer found that students of SMAN 1 Simeulue Timur are better in speaking ability than those of Muhammadiyah Islamic School Simeulue Timur. Therefore, the writer suggests that the teachers of boarding school should evaluate their teaching learning process and have more motivation to improve their student’s ability English speaking
Downloads
References
Al-Kufaishi, Adil. 1988. A Vocabulary Building Program Is Necessity Not A Luxury. English Teaching Forum. Vol xxvi 2 April 1988.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2005. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.
Brown, H.Douglas. 2004. Langage Assestment: Principles and Classroom Practices. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Brown, and G. Yule. 1988. Teaching the spoken language. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://www.wikipedia.com
Access on Thursday, January 21st, 2007, 10:30 WIB.
Brumfit, Christopher. 1994. Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching. Massachussets: Cambridge university press.
Campbell, N. Russel. 1979. Linguistic and Social Aspects of Communicative Competence. USA: Wn.C.Brown Company Publisher.
Chitravelu, N. Sithamparam, S and Choon, the soo. 1996. ELT Methodology: Principle and Practice. Selangor: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Darul Ehsan.
Davies, R. 2000. Qualitative and Quantitative Market Research. Canada: Orient Pacific Century. Available in http://www.Asiamarketresearch.Com/ columns/ markets.Html. Access on January 22, 2008.
Gautam. 1988. In Nurul Inayah’s Thesis. Syiah Kuala University. 2007.
Green, A. Harry and Petty T. Walter. 1963. Developing Language Skills in Elementary Schools. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Gurrey, P. 1986. Testing English as a Foreign Language. London: Longmans Green and Co, Ltd
Hajar, Siti. 2004. Comparative Study between Private English Fast and Harvard English Students in Mastering Reading Comprehension. Unsyiah, Banda Aceh. Unpublished.
Hance, Kenneth. G.David. C.Raphl and Milton, J. Wiksell. 1962. Principles of Speaking. Belmont, California: Wadsworth publishing Company.
Harris, David P. 1969. Testing English as The Second Language. New York: Mc Graw Hill Book Company.
Harycraft, John. 1988. An Introduction to English Language Teaching. London: Longman Group.
Hopkins, W.G. 2000. Quantitative Research Design. New Zealand: University of Otago. Available in http://www.Sportsci.Org/jour/0001/wghdesign. Html. Access on January 22,
Classroom: Application and for Communication Approach. London: Longman Group Limited.
Shumin, Kang. 1997. In Dini Rizki’s thesis. Syiah Kuala University. 2008.
Shafritz, Jay M. Koeppe, Richard P. And Soper, Elizabeth W. 1988. The Facts on File Dictionary of Education. USA: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.
Sidney I, Ladau. 1975. The Doubleday Dictionary for Home, School, and Office. USA: Doubleday & Company, Inc.
Skinner, Paul. H and Shelton, Ralph. L. 1978. Speech, Language, and Hearing (Normal Processes and Disorder). Philipines: Addison Publishing Company, Inc.
Sudjana, MA. 2002. Metoda Statistika. Bandung:Tarsito.
Sudijono, Anas. 1987. Pengantar statistic pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.
Supriatna, Agus. 1999. Pendidikan Keterampilan Berbahasa. Modul Departemen Agama RI. Dirjen Pembinaan Kelembagaan Agama Islam.
Vasile, Albert J and Mintz, Harold K. 1977. Speak with Confidence: A Practical Guide. Cambridge. Massachussets: Winthrop publisher, Inc.
Wigg, Hammerson. E and Eleanor, Missing Semel. 1985. Language Assesment and Intervention for The Learning Disabled. Colombus, Ohio: E. Merril Publishing Company.
Wise, and Gray. 1959. In Dini Rizki’s thesis. Syiah Kuala University. 2008.
Wise, and Brochers. 1996. In Septia Irnanda’s Thesis. Syiah Kuala University. 2007.
Woolbert. 1920. In Septia Irnanda’s Thesis. Syiah Kuala University. 2007.
Abstract views: 105
PDF downloads: 119
