STUDENTS CONCEPTIONS OF THE ENERGY CRISIS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Abstract
This cross-sectional study looks at how junior high and elementary school students think about crisis energy. The tool is sent out through an open-ended online survey. There were 167 people who took part in the study. The number of sixth-grade elementary school students (14), seventh-grade students (51), eighth-grade students (6), and ninth-grade students (96) in Bandung City. The study's results showed that ninth-grade students came up with the most ideas, followed by eighth- and seventh-grade students. The ninth graders came up with the idea that "environmental crisis" was the most crucial concept; among eight pupils, "energy limitation" seemed to be the most critical concept; and among high school students, “energy" was the most crucial concept. These results suggest that higher levels of education can help people come up with bigger ideas about crisis energy. This is because they can learn through theory or practice. Ninth graders now know more about ideas related to the energy crisis. The research has implications for teachers because it lets them teach students more advanced ideas about crisis energy in addition to the basics
Downloads
References
Ali, M. I., Abduh, A., Mahmud, R., & Dunakhir, S. (2023). Raising Students’ Awareness on Environmental Education Issues. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i1.59146
Barbar, M., Mallapragada, D. S., & Stoner, R. (2022). Decision making under uncertainty for deploying battery storage as a non-wire alternative in distribution networks. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(May), 100862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100862
Chen, X. Da. (2001). The dual near-field effect in radio frequency simulation. In Xitong Fangzhen Xuebao/Acta Simulata Systematica Sinica (Vol. 13, Issue 1).
Creswell, J. (2018). Key Point Chapter Summaries for John Creswell’s Research Design Textbook on Qualitative, Quantitative, & Mixed Methods Approach. 1–40.
Eymur, G., & Çetin, P. S. (2024). Investigating the role of an inquiry-based science lab on students’ scientific literacy. Instructional Science, 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09672-w
Farghali, M., Osman, A. I., Mohamed, I. M. A., Chen, Z., Chen, L., Ihara, I., Yap, P. S., & Rooney, D. W. (2023). Strategies to save energy in the context of the energy crisis: a review. In Environmental Chemistry Letters (Vol. 21, Issue 4). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01591-5
Gajdzik, B., Wolniak, R., Nagaj, R., Žuromskaitė-Nagaj, B., & Grebski, W. W. (2024). The Influence of the Global Energy Crisis on Energy Efficiency: A Comprehensive Analysis. Energies, 17(4), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040947
Gitelman, L. D., & Kozhevnikov, M. V. (2023). New Approaches to the Concept of Energy Transition in the Times of Energy Crisis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065167
Hakam, D. F., Nugraha, H., Wicaksono, A., Rahadi, R. A., & Kanugrahan, S. P. (2022). Mega conversion from LPG to induction stove to achieve Indonesia’s clean energy transition. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(May), 100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100856
Han, J., & Balabanis, G. (2024). Meta-analysis of social media influencer impact: Key antecedents and theoretical foundations. Psychology and Marketing, 41(2), 394–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21927
Hasan, M. M., & Raza, M. Y. (2022). Nexus of natural gas consumption and economic growth: Does the 2041 Bangladesh development goal realistic within its limited resource? Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(May), 100863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100863
Hays, J., & Reinders, H. (2020). Sustainable learning and education: A curriculum for the future. International Review of Education, 66(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09820-7
Huang, Z., Ming, X., & Duan, H. (2022). Heterogeneous effects of energy poverty convergence in Europe. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(March), 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100822
Learners, M. G., Expectations, M. H., Gerrold, D., Committee on Highly Successful Schools or Programs in K-12 STEM, & Education; National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Committee on Highly Successful Schools or Programs in K-12 STEM Education; National Research Council. In Mathematics Education in the Middle Grades. https://www.ltrr.arizona.edu/~sheppard/TUSD/NRC2011.pdf
Leonard, A., Ahsan, A., Charbonnier, F., & Hirmer, S. (2022). The resource curse in renewable energy: A framework for risk assessment. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100841
Li, Y., Alharthi, M., Ahmad, I., Hanif, I., & Ul Hassan, M. (2022). Nexus between renewable energy, natural resources and carbon emissions under the shadow of transboundary trade relationship from South East Asian economies. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(May), 100855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100855
Lu, J., Chen, H., & Cai, X. (2022). From global to national scenarios: Exploring carbon emissions to 2050. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(May), 100860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100860
Mahbub, T., Ahammad, M. F., Tarba, S. Y., & Mallick, S. M. Y. (2022). Factors encouraging foreign direct investment (FDI) in the wind and solar energy sector in an emerging country. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(May), 100865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100865
Majava, A., Vadén, T., Toivanen, T., Järvensivu, P., Lähde, V., & Eronen, J. T. (2022). Sectoral low-carbon roadmaps and the role of forest biomass in Finland’s carbon neutrality 2035 target. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100836
Malik, H., Yadav, A. K., Márquez, F. P. G., & Pinar-Pérez, J. M. (2022). Novel application of Relief Algorithm in cascaded artificial neural network to predict wind speed for wind power resource assessment in India. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100864
Park, Y. E. (2022). Research evidence for reshaping global energy strategy based on trend-based approach of big data analytics in the corona era. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(March), 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100835
Prike, T., Butler, L. H., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2024). Source-credibility information and social norms improve truth discernment and reduce engagement with misinformation online. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57560-7
Rusyati, L., Rustaman, N. Y., Widodo, A., & Ha, M. (2021). the Conception of Soils: a Cross-Sectional Study Based on the School’S Perspective. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16, 34–41.
Si, Y. (2022). Co-authorship in energy justice studies: Assessing research collaboration through social network analysis and topic modeling. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(May), 100859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100859
Strzelecki, A., & Miklosik, A. (2024). Device-dependent click-through rate estimation in Google organic search results based on clicks and impressions data. Aslib Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-04-2023-0107
Xiuhui, J., & Raza, M. Y. (2022). Delving into Pakistan’s industrial economy and carbon mitigation: An effort toward sustainable development goals. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(March), 100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100839
Xu, J., Akhtar, M., Haris, M., Muhammad, S., Abban, O. J., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2022). Energy crisis, firm profitability, and productivity: An emerging economy perspective. Energy Strategy Reviews, 41(January), 100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100849
Abstract views: 136
PDF downloads: 66
1_(1)1.png)
