DEVELOPING AN ENGLISH-SPEAKING SKILLS ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR AUTISM CHILDREN USING UNIVERSAL DESIGN FOR LEARNING
Abstract
This study aims to develop an adaptive English-speaking skills assessment rubric for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) using the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in a Special Education School (SLB). The need for an inclusive and flexible assessment tool that accommodates the diverse communication needs of children with ASD in language learning contexts, particularly English, is crucial. The research follows a systematic methodology consisting of needs analysis, rubric development, expert validation, pilot testing, revisions, and finalization. The rubric developed integrates UDL principles to ensure that assessments capture both verbal and non-verbal communication skills, such as gestures, visual aids, and assistive technologies. The findings from the expert validation process revealed that the rubric was clear, comprehensive, and adaptable to various student needs, providing a more holistic assessment of speaking skills. Teachers reported increased engagement and flexibility in using the rubric, which allowed students to express themselves in multiple ways. The pilot test indicated high inter-rater reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.85) and demonstrated that the rubric effectively assessed students with varying levels of proficiency. Students who previously struggled with verbal communication showed improvement through the use of non-verbal means, enhancing their participation in the assessment. This study highlights the potential of integrating UDL principles into assessment rubrics to support the inclusive education of children with ASD and provide more accurate and equitable evaluations of their language skills.
Downloads
References
Afrasiabi, S. (2018). High-functioning autism spectrum disorder in the English classroom. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction. Longman Inc.
Brignell, A., Chenausky, K. V., Song, H., Zhu, J., Suo, C., & Morgan, A. T. (2018). Communication interventions for autism spectrum disorder in minimally verbal children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012324.pub2
Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Pearson Education.
Coyne, P., Pisha, B., Dalton, B., Zeph, L. A., & Smith, N. C. (2012). Literacy by design: A Universal Design for Learning approach for students with significant intellectual disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33(3), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510381651
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Cui, M., Ni, Q., & Wang, Q. (2023). Review of intervention methods for language and communication disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders. PeerJ, 11, e15735. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15735
El Shemy, I., Jaccheri, L., Giannakos, M., & Vulchanova, M. (2024). Augmented reality-enhanced language learning for children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic literature review. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43(16), 4097–4124. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2304607
Fulcher, G. (2015). Assessing second language speaking. Language Teaching, 48(2), 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000391
Hall, T. E., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2012). Universal Design for Learning in the classroom: Practical applications. The Guilford Press.
Hermawan, A. F., et al. (2024). Pengembangan sistem komunikasi alternatif dan augmentatif pada aplikasi “E-Comm (Electronic Communication)”. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(5), 5613–5621. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i5.6999
Hodgdon, L. (1995). Visual strategies for improving communication: Practical supports for school and home. Quirk Roberts Publishing.
Humphrey, N., & Symes, W. (2013). Inclusive education for pupils with autistic spectrum disorders in secondary mainstream schools: Teacher attitudes, experience and knowledge. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2011.580462
Latifa, A., et al. (2015). Developing a practical rating rubric of speaking test for university students of English in Parepare, Indonesia. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 166. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p166
Litton, F. W., Rotatori, A. F., Coombs-Richardson, R., & Martinez, R. (2017). Preparation for teachers for students with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A call for quality and quantity. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 225–230.
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
Mody, M., Belliveau, J. W., & Harvard Medical School. (2012). Speech and language impairments in autism: Insights from behavior and neuroimaging. American Chinese Journal of Medicine and Science, 5(3), 157. https://doi.org/10.7156/v5i3p157
Panerai, S., Ferrante, L., & Zingale, M. (2002). Benefits of the Treatment and Education of Autistic and Communication Handicapped Children (TEACCH) programme as compared with a non‐specific approach. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(4), 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00388.x
Paul, R., & Fahim, D. (2014). Assessing communication in Autism Spectrum Disorders. In F. R. Volkmar et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders (4th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118911389.hautc27
Phan, T. X., & Phuong, H. Y. (2017). Using analytic rubric for speaking self-assessment: EFL students’ perceptions and challenges. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(3), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0703043439
Rao, K., Ok, M. W., & Bryant, B. R. (2014). A review of research on Universal Design educational models. Remedial and Special Education, 35(3), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513518980
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
Saputra, D., & Maghfiroh, A. (2023). Cara komunikasi nonverbal pada anak autis di Sekolah Luar Biasa (SLB) Negeri Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur Provinsi Jambi.
Simpson, R. L. (2005). Evidence-based practices and students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(3), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576050200030201
Supena, A., & Munajah, R. (2020). Analisis kesulitan belajar membaca anak berkebutuhan khusus di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.558
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Trembath, D., Paynter, J., Sutherland, R., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2019). Assessing communication in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder who are minimally verbal. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 6(3), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-019-00171-z
Ulker, V. (2017). The design and use of speaking assessment rubrics.
UNESCO. (2005). Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring access to education for all.
Volkmar, F. R. (Ed.). (2019). Autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108297769
Wilson, L. O., & Leslie, C. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom’s taxonomy revised.
Abstract views: 164
PDF downloads: 75
1_(1)1.png)
