SPRINTA-BSD: MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CODING BERBASIS COMPUTATIONAL THINKING, PROYEK, DAN REFLEKSI PADA PEMBELAJARAN DIGITAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46244/jeulame.v1i2.3915Keywords:
AI education, coding, computational thinking, digital portfolio, project-based learning, SPRINTA-BSDAbstract
Coding learning in schools should not be understood merely as syntax writing practice, but as a learning space to develop computational thinking, problem solving, collaboration, creativity, and reflection. This study aims to formulate and analyze the SPRINTA-BSD coding learning model based on the app.bsd.application platform. The study employed a qualitative approach through a structured conceptual review. The primary sources were the SPRINTA-BSD model development manuscript and an examination of platform features, while supporting sources included national and international literature on coding education, computational thinking, project-based learning, AI education, digital assessment, and flexible learning. The analysis was conducted through concept reduction, thematic coding, syntax mapping, and pedagogical synthesis. The findings indicate that SPRINTA-BSD consists of six main stages: Sign In and Stimulation, Project Orientation and Problem Mapping, Resource Reading and Guided Exploration, Interactive Coding and Idea Building, Networked Technology Action, and Assessment, Reflection, and Advancement. The novelty of the model lies in its integration of learning syntax, platform features, teacher activities, student activities, process assessment, digital portfolios, sandbox exploration, feedback, and reflection into a coherent learning flow. The model strengthens coding learning by positioning errors as learning resources rather than failures. SPRINTA-BSD is also aligned with the Naval Collaboration Flexible Learning (NCFL) concept in terms of collaboration, flexibility, authentic learning experiences, and planned instructional design. This study concludes that SPRINTA-BSD has the potential to become a contemporary coding learning model; however, its effectiveness needs to be further examined through expert validation and classroom implementation.
References
Arslan Namli, N., & Aybek, B. (2022). An investigation of the effect of block-based programming and unplugged coding activities on fifth graders’ computational thinking skills, self-efficacy and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(1), Article ep341. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11477
Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 1052–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021- 00285-9
Bandono, A. (2020a). The effect of the learning model Naval Collaboration Flexible Learning (NCFL) on the quality of education outcomes: An innovative approach to Islamic Religious Education in the Naval College of Technology. Halaqa: Islamic Education Journal, 4(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.21070/halaqa.v4i2.1088
Bandono, A. (2020b). Model pembelajaran Naval Collaboration Flexible Learning (NCFL) [Naval Collaboration Flexible Learning (NCFL) learning model]. STTAL.
Bandono, A., Rahman, A., & Suharyo, O. S. (2020). The application model of Naval Collaboration Flexible Learning (NCFL) in the Indonesian Naval Technology College: A case study. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 23(2), 498–505.
Bati, K. (2022). A systematic literature review regarding computational thinking and programming in early childhood education. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 2059–2082. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10700-2
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 1–25). Vancouver, Canada.
Camalia, A. R., & Rokhmaniyah. (2024). Analysis of the implementation of the Computational Thinking approach in Natural Science Learning in high elementary school classes. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series, 7(3), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v7i3.91541
Celik, I. (2023). Exploring the determinants of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy: Digital divide, computational thinking, cognitive absorption. Telematics and Informatics, 83, Article 102026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102026
Chai, C. S., Lin, P.-Y., Jong, M. S.-Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K. F., & Qin, J. (2021). Perceptions of and behavioral intentions towards learning artificial intelligence in primary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 89–101.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amilia Khasanah Marzuki, Adi Bandono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).















