A GENDER-BASED ANALYSIS OF OBSERVANCE AND NON-OBSERVANCE OF CONVERSATIONAL MAXIMS IN FRONT OFFICE STAFF’S SPEECH AT RESTAURANTS IN UBUD DISTRICT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v8i1.1148Keywords:
Conversational maxims, Gender, Observance of maxims, Non-observance of maximsAbstract
This study was intended to investigate, describe and explain how conversational maxims are observed by the Front Office staff at restaurants in Ubud when they handle table reservation and what types of non-observance are committed by the Front Office staff in observing conversational maxims. The subjects were the Front Office staff at restaurants in Ubud district. The data for this naturalistic qualitative study were collected through observation and audio-recording which were then analyzed by using Paul Grice’s (1975) Cooperative Principle theory. In this research, there were 30 conversations of taking table reservation via telephone which were conducted by the front office staff at restaurants in Ubud sub-district when they handle table reservation. Generally, both male and female front office staff produced more observance of maxims than non-observance of maxims. The highest frequency of observance and non-observance of Gricean maxims produced by male front office staff was maxim of quantity (100%), then followed by flouting of maxims (62.5%), and infringing maxims (25%). The highest frequency of observance and non-observance of Gricean maxims produced by female front office staff was maxim of quantity (100%), then followed by flouting of maxims (68.1%), and infringing of maxims (9.0%). Moreover, there was no opting out of maxims and suspending of maxims occurred in the conversation. The utterances were obtained from 30 data in restaurant setting. In general, both male and female front office staff produced more observance of maxims than non-observance of maxims.
References
Asri, D.E.S. (2015). An Analysis of Flouting Maxim in EFL Classroom Interaction. Graduate Program of PPS UNNES: Jounal Vision, Volume 4 No.2, October 2015
Chenail, J.S. & Chenail, R.J. (2011).Communicating Qualitative Analytical Results Following Grice’s Conversational Maxims. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), 276-285.Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR16-1/grice.pdf Accessed on 3 November 2020.
Dewi, G.A.O.C., Artawa, K., & Udayana, I.N. (2016). The Violation of Politeness Maxims by the Characters in the Movie White House Down. English Department Faculty of Arts, Udayana University: Jurnal Humanis, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Udayana Vol 16.1 Juli 2016: 48-54
Fahmi, R. (2016). An Analysis of Grice’s Maxims Violation in Daily Conversation. IKIP Mataram: Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, Vol. 4 No.2, November 2016.
Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N.E. (1993). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In: Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press 1975, 41-58; here 45-47
Grice, H.P. (1975). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gustary, D.T. & Dikramdhanie, M. (2018). The Analysis of Flouting Maxim in Mata Najwa’s Talkshow ‘Gengsi Merebut Kursi’. STBA Technocrat Tanggerang, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: BIORMATIKA Jurnal Ilmiah FKIP Universitas Subang Vol. 4 No. 01 Februari 2018
Hamadi, M.A. & Muhammed, B.J. (2009). PRAGMATICS: GRICE'S CONVERSATIONAL MAXIMS VIOLATIONS IN THE RESPONSES OF SOME WESTERN POLITICIANS. University of Basrah, College of Arts: IRAQI Academic Scientific Journals No. (50). 2009 Retrieved from https://www.iasj.net/iasj?func=article&aId=53089 Accessed on 3 November 2020.
Hawley, P. (2002). What is said. Cambrigde: Journal of Pragmatics.
Khosravizadeh, P. & Sadehvandi, N. (2011). Some Instances of Violation and Flouting of the Maxim of Quantity by the Main Characters (Barry & Tim) in Dinner for Schmucks. Sharif University of Technology: International Conference on Languages, Literature and Linguistics IPEDR Vol. 26 (2011) IACSIT Press Singapore
Kondowe, W., Ngwira, F.F., & Madula, P. (2014). The Linguistic Analysis of Malawi Political Newspaper Cartoons on President Joyce Banda: Towards Grice’s Conversational Implicature Wellman Kondowe Lecturer in Linguistics. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4, No. 7(1) Accessed on 3 November 2020.
Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McMillan, J.H. & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry (Seventh Edition). Virginia Commonwealth University: Pearson.
Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. California: SAGE publications Inc.
Mukaro, L., Mugari, V. & Dhumukwa, A. (2013). Violation of Conversational Maxims in Shona. Department of Linguistics, University of Zimbabwe, Harare: Journal of Comparative Literature and Culture (JCLC) 161 Vol. 2, No. 4, 2013 Retrieved from www.worldsciencepublisher.org Accessed on 3 November 2020.
Prihattin, M.E. (2019). The Violation of Conversational Maxims of the Main Characters’ Utterances to Support the Plot Twist of the Story on Now You See Me Movie. A Thesis. Linguistics in English Department Faculty of Humanities, Diponegoro University
Purnami, N.M.A. (2015). A Gender-based Analysis of Observance and Non-Observance of Conversational Maxims in Front Office Students’ Speech at Mediterranean College in Academic Year 2015/2016. Thesis. English Language Education Department, Post Graduate Program, Ganesha University of Education: Singaraja.
Raharja, A. U. S. & Rosyidha, A. (2019). Maxim of Cooperative Violation by Dodit Mulyanto in Stand-up Comedy Indonesia Season 4. Institut Agama Islam Negeri Salatiga: Journal of Pragmatics Research. Retrieved from https://e-journal.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/jopr/article/view/2532 Accessed on 10th November 2020.
Rahmi, S.S., Refnaldi, & Wahyuni, D. (2018). The Violation of Conversational Maxims found in Political Conversation at Rosi Talkshow. English Department Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Padang: E-Journal of English Language and Literature Volume 7 No. 1 Retrieved from http://103.216.87.80/index.php/ell/article/view/9910 Accessed on 3 November 2020.
Sari, R. (2019). Violations of Grice’s Conversational Maxims by an English Teacher at an Elementary School in Binjai. Study Program of English Applied Linguistics, Postgraduate School, Universitas Negeri Medan: Proceedings of the 2nd English Education International Conference (EEIC) in conjunction with the 9 th Annual International Conference (AIC), Universitas Syiah Kuala, September 18-19, 2019, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Sugiyono, (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tajabadi, A., Dowlatabadi, H., & Mehric, E. (2014). Grice’s Cooperative Maxims in Oral Arguments: The Case of Dispute Settlement Councils in Iran. Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, International Conference on Current Trends in ELT, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences: Elsevier Ltd.
Thomas, J.A. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London and New York: Longman.
Wildana, R., Wisasongko, & Wahyuningsih, A.T. (2019). The Violation of the Politeness Principle Maxims in 300 Movie Subtitle. English Department, Faculty of Humanities, Jember University: Haluan Sastra Budaya Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Humaniora
Yule, G. (1996). The Study of Language. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Zebua, E., Rukmini, D., & Saleh, M. (2017). The Violation and Flouting of Cooperative Principles in the Ellen Degeneres Talk Show. Akademi Komunitas Negeri Nias Utara, Semarang State University, Indonesia: Language Circle Journal of Language and Literature 12 (1) October 2017 Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id Accessed on 10th November 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All works published in the Getsempena English Education Journal (GEEJ) are licensed & copyrighted under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The editorial board of the GEEJ shares common vision with Universitas Bina Bangsa Getsempena as a Publisher in providing unrestricted access to knowledge and education for all and thereby follows Open Access Policy to showcase its content. The GEEJ follows open access copyright and licensing policy on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Universitas Bina Bangsa Getsempena and the GEEJ adhere to a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors submitting and publishing in the GEEJ agree to the copyright policy under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Under this license, the authors published in the GEEJ retain the copyright, and all other authors using the content of the GEEJ are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work.
