• Sri Wahyuni STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena
Keywords: Reading, Cloze Exercises, Mastering Reading


Cloze procedure is a technique in which words are deleted from a reading passage. In this study, researcher used purposive cloze that deleted content word, such as: noun, adjective and verb. The data taken from 43 students belong to both groups, the experimental group (22 students) and control group (21 students), of the second grade students of SMA Al-Falah Abu Lam-U. The instrument used for collecting the data is test in order to know the students’ achievement in completing nouns, adjectives and verbs, while pre-test and post-test in order to get the result of both groups. The result was analyzed by using statistical formula, such as by calculating the mean score, standard deviation and t-test in order to know whether there is the difference between experimental and control group performance in completing reading with content word deletion. The researcher used percentage formula in order to find out the difference of students’ achievement in completing noun, adjective, and verb deletions in reading passage and also to find out in what level the experimental and control group based on the cloze reading inventory level. Based on the data analysis, the writer found that there is a significant difference between cloze exercise for experimental group and conventional way for control group. It can be shown with the t-test result which is higher than the t-table result (9,41>2,02). It means that the researcher accepts her alternative hypothesis that there is a difference between both techniques, and cloze exercise technique is better than conventional technique. The deletion of verbs is quite easy for both groups. The average percentages of the post-test covers 66% noun, 59% adjective and 73% verb for the experimental group, while the control group results are 59% noun, 51% adjective and 61% verb. To support the data above, the researcher also divided the students’ achievement based on “cloze reading inventory level”. Most of the experimental students are in independent level with the average percentage 66% and few of them in instructional level. While in control group, only few of students are in independent level with the average percentage 58% and most of them are in instructional level.


Download data is not yet available.


Adults. 2009. ESL Cloze Exercises to Teaching. ESL Adults Home Page. Retrieved March, 16, 2012, from (http://www.teaching-esl-to-adults. com / esl-cloze-exercises.html.

Borg, Walter R. and Gall, Meredith D 1989. Educational Research. An Introduction. London. Longman Goup Ltd. (fifth edition).

Brown, H. Doughlas. 2001. Teaching By Principles. An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. San Francisco State University. 2nd Edition

Ellen, David Edward. 1977. Technique Foreign Languages and English as a Second Language. Boston, Boston College.

Firsten, Richard and Killian, Patricia. 2000. The ELT Grammar Book: A Teacher-Friendly Reference Guide. Alta Book Center Publishers.

Girgin, Umit 2008. Evaluatin of Hearing Impaired Student’s Reading Comprehension With The Cloze Procedure. Turkey. Anadolu University

Grellet, Francois. 1986. Developing Reading Skills: A Practical Guide to reading

Comprehension Exercise. London, Cambridge university Press

Harris, Pauline 2006. Reading in Primary School Years. Australia. Thomson Social Science Press.

Hatch, Evelyn and Farhady, Hossein 1982. Research Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. Rowley, Massachusetts 01969. Rowley.London. Tokyo. Newbury Publishers, Inc.

Harmer, Jeremy. 1991, The Practice of English Language Teaching. Longman Handbook for Language Teacher, London and New York. New Edition.

Jongsma, Eugene A. 1980. Cloze Instruction Research a Second Look. Newark, DEL: International Reading Association, ERIC: ED: 194 881.

O’Malley, Michael J. and Valdez, Lorraine Pierce 1996. Authentic Assessment for English Language Learner (Practical Approaches for Teachers. Addison Wesley Publishing Company.

Reep, Diana C. 1991. Technical Writing Principles, Strategies, and Reading. New York. Allyn and Bacon.

Salasi, R. 2001. Statistika Dasar. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Banda Aceh. Universitas Syiah Kuala.

Sudijono, Anas. 2005. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Walker, B. 2005. Techniques for reading assessment and instruction (5 th ed.). U.S.A. Pearson Education Ltd.

Article Metrics
Abstract views: 150
PDF downloads: 99
How to Cite

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>