ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' NUMERATION SKILLS FOR LINEAR EQUATIONS MATERIAL BASED ON HONEY AND MUMFORD'S LEARNING STYLE
Abstract
The results of observations at SMP Negeri 02 Gondanglegi Class VII A showed that students were less precise in solving conceptual understanding questions. It can be seen that students cannot understand the changes in positive and negative signs when moving numbers in an equation, so this numeracy research is needed to identify students' difficulties. The focus of the research is to describe students'numeracy abilities based on Honey and Mumford's learning style in solving linear equation problems in class VII A of SMP Negeri 02 Gondanglegi. The research uses descriptive qualitative research. The subjects consisted of 4 students with the highest scores in different learning styles according to Honey and Mumford, namely: activists, reflectors, theorists, and pragmatists. Data collection procedures include questionnaires, tests, interviews, and documentation. Data is evaluated through a process of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. Based on the analysis, students with a pragmatic learning style have better numeracy skills because the student's character is open, giving rise to great curiosity, trial and error, courage and creativity. Students with an activist learning style improve their numeracy skills when their numeracy skills increase along with their greater curiosity. Meanwhile, students with a reflector learning style have invisible numeracy abilities, and are even disturbed because they think randomly. Students with a theoretical learning style have high numeracy skills in the applying question type and dominate in the employ step according to routine training by the teacher. It was concluded that students with a pragmatic learning style had higher numeracy abilities, compared to students with an activist, reflector, or theoretical learning style. It is important that this research was carried out as a contribution to improving students' numeracy skills by using the Honey and Mumford learning style as a reference.
References
Akbar, P., Hamid, A., Bernard, M., & Sugandi, AI (2017). Analysis of Problem-Solving Abilities and Mathematical Disposition of Class Xi Students of Sma Putra Juang in Opportunity Material. Scholar's Journal: Journal of Mathematics Education, 2 (1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v2i1.62
Arifin, M. (2020). Numbered Head Together (NHT) Learning Strategy in Increasing Student Interest in Learning Statistics Material. Didactical Mathematics, 2 (2), 10. https://doi.org/10.31949/dmj.v2i2.2074
Basir, MA (2015). Students' Reasoning Ability in Mathematical Problem Solving Viewed from Cognitive Style. Unissula FKIP Mathematics Education Journal, 3 (1), 106–114.
Basri, H., Kurnadi, B., Tafriliyanto, CF, Bayu, P., Madura, U., & Kotabumi, UM (2021). Investigation of Numeracy Ability. Proximal: Journal of Mathematics Research and Mathematics Education, 4, 72–79.
Fadlilah, C., & Siswono, TYE (2022). Students' Creative Thinking Ability to Assimilate and Converge in Solving Numeracy Problems. MATHEdunesa, 11 (2), 548–561. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n2.p548-561
Fauziah, N., Roza, Y., & Maimunah, M. (2022). Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in Solving AKM Numeracy Type Questions. Scholar's Journal: Journal of Mathematics Education, 6 (3), 3241–3250. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i3.1471
Han, W., Susanto, D., Dewayani, S., Pandora, P., Hanifah, N., Miftahussururi., Nento, MN, & Akbari, QS (2017). Numeracy Literacy Support Material. Ministry of Education and Culture, Ministry of Education and Culture GLN Team. , 8 (9), 1–58.
Heryani, Y., & Ramadani, R. (2019). Analysis of Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Abilities Based on the Honey-Mumford Model Learning Style. Journal of Metaeducation; Journal of Educational Sciences, 1 (2), 66–71.
Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (2012). Mumford and Honey Learning Styles questionnaire. The Institute of Legal Finance and Management, 10. https://www.mint-hr.com/mumford.html
Islamiyati, I., Nugroho, AA, & Ariyanto, L. (2019). Profile of Mathematical Problem Solving Ability on SPLDV Material Seen from Reflective Cognitive Style. Imaginaries: Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 1 (6), 300–305. https://doi.org/10.26877/imaginer.v1i6.4857
Kurniawati, I., & Kurniasari, I. (2019). Students' Mathematical Literacy in Solving Pisa Questions on Space and Shape Content Seen from Multiple Intelligences. MATHEdunesa, 8 (2), 441–448.
Latifah, T., & Afriansyah, EA (2021). Difficulties in Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in Statistics Material. Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), 3 (2), 134–150.
Nurlaili, N., Fauzan, A., Yerizon, Y., Musdi, E., & Syarifuddin, H. (2022). Analysis of Students' Mathematical Literacy in the Integral Calculus Course. Scholar's Journal: Journal of Mathematics Education, 6 (3), 3228–3240. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i3.1734
Pangesti, FTP (2018). Developing Literacy. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education, 5 (9), 566–575.
Putri, FE, Amelia, F., & Gusmania, Y. (2019). The Relationship Between Learning Style and Active Learning in Mathematics on Student Learning Outcomes. Education: Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 2 (2), 83. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v2i2.406
Rahmi, L., & Yulianti, K. (2022). Learning Obstacles Faced by Students in Understanding Relationship and Function Topics. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 5 (4), 929–940. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v5i4.929-940
Riana, & Fitrianna, AY (2021). Analysis of difficulties in solving opportunity questions for class IX junior high school students in terms of Bloom's taxonomy. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 4 (4), 1019–1032. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i4.1019-1032
Risywandha, I., & Khabibah, S. (2018). Literacy Mathematics Class X high school students in solving PISA model questions were reviewed of Gender Differences. Scientific Journal of Mathematics Education, 2 (7), 248-255.
Rosydiana, A.-. (2017). Analysis of Students' Ability to Solve Story Problems Based on Polya's Problem Solving Steps. Mathematics Education Journal, 1 (1), 54. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v1i1.4550
Sanvi, AH, & Diana, HA (2022). Analysis of Numeracy Ability in Matrix Material. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3 (2), 129–145.
Susanti, E., P, NC, Susanti, E., P, NC, Susanti, E., & P, NC (2021). Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability Judging from Honey Mumford's theoretical Learning Style STKIP Singkawang (Mathematics Education, STKIP Singkawang) STKIP Singkawang (Mathematics Education, STKIP Singkawang) Corresponding Author: evisusanti2806@gm. 7, 1–8.
Suwardi. (2022). Analysis of Mathematical Connection Ability in Transformation Material for Class Xi Students of SMK Negeri 1 Lahusa, Journal of Mathematics Education. 44 (01), 4–6.
Talantu, E.G., Monoarfa, J.F., & Regar, V.E. (2023). Analysis of Problem-Solving Ability According to Polya for Class VIII Students of SMP Negeri 3 Kombi on the Material of Building a Flat Side Room. Scholar's Journal: Journal of Mathematics Education, 7 (3), 3292–3303. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2726
Wijaya, A., & Dewaani, S. (2021). Minimum Competency Assessment Framework (AKM). Research and Development and Books Agency, Ministry of Education and Culture, 1–108.
Winata, A., Widiyanti, ISR, & Sri Cacik. (2021). Analysis of Numeracy Ability in Developing Minimum Ability Assessment Questions for Class XI High School Students to Solve Science Problems. Journal of Education FKIP UNMA, 7 (2), 498–508. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i2.1090
Yulianci, S., & Nurjumiati. (2020). Analysis of the Characteristics of Students' VAK (Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic) Learning Styles in Physics Learning. Journal of Mathematics Education, 10 (1), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v10i1.328
Abstract views: 2
PDF downloads: 1
