(Scaffolding English for Junior High School Students)

  • Hijjatul Qamariah STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena
Keywords: communicative curriculum, syllabus, textbook analysis


In this paper, the textbook of junior high school entitled Scaffolding: English for Junior High School Students is analyzed. To this end, types of syllabus containing in the book are firstly explored.  Then, it is argued what types of syllabus is dominantly governed the textbook by examining the content, activities and tasks in the textbook. It is revealed that the textbook predominantly instructed by structural syllabus with an approach of genre-based syllabus. However, the book is lacked of communicative approach even though the activities designed are aimed at increasing communicative competence of the students.  Finally, the suggestion is made for the perfection of the textbook. It is recommended that to be more communicative in teaching and learning language, teacher can manipulate some activities in the textbook to be more expressive and real. In addition, the translation in every instruction of the task is not a good point of this textbook. It is supposed to be the learners acquire it as they are emergent in the process of learning. It will be meaningful for the learners when they understand by themselves without any translation provided.


Baleghizadeh, S. (2012). Grammatical Syllabus and EFL Textbook: The need for consciousness-raising activities. PerLinguam 28(1), 111-116.

Breen, M.P. (2001). Syllabus design. In. R. Carter & D. Nunan (eds). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speaker of other languages, (pp.151-9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Breen, M. P., & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 89-110.

Dewerianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RECL Journal, 34(2), 133-54.

Graves, K. (2008). The language curriculum: A social contextual perspective. Langugae Teaching, 41(2), 147-81.

Guangyong Sun., & Liying Cheng. (2002). From Context to Curriculum: A Case Study of Communicative Language Teaching in China. TESL CANADA JOURNAL/ REVUE TESL DU CANADA, 19 (2).

Hall, D., & Hewings, A. (Eds.). (2001). Innovation in English language teaching. London: Routledge.

Jalilzadeh, K., Tahmasebbi, A. (2014) Content based Syllabus. European Journal Of Scientific Research, 1: 3.

Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 279-95.

Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Priyana, J., Riandi, Mumpuni, A.P. (2008). Scaffolding: English for junior high school students. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

White, R.V. (1988) The ELT curriculum: Design, innovation and management. Oxford: Blackwell.

Willis, D. (1990). The lexical syllabus. Collin ELT retrieved 12 August 2012. (http://www.cels.bhn.ac.uk/resources/lexSyllabus/lexsch1.pdf)

Tarfa Ash‐Shammari, & Dina Al‐Sibai. (2005). A presentation of the situational approach & the functional‐notional approach to syllabus design. retrieved 1 April 2016. (http:// www.orion2020.org/archivo/cen/approach.pdf)
Article Metrics
Abstract views: 293
pdf downloads: 80
How to Cite
Hijjatul Qamariah. (2016). A REPORT OF TEXTBOOK ANALYSIS : (Scaffolding English for Junior High School Students). Getsempena English Education Journal , 3(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v3i1.695

Most read articles by the same author(s)