THEME AND RHEME ANALYSIS AND POLITENESS STRATEGY IN DIPLOMATIC WORKPLACE WRITING: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

  • Rahardjo Rahardjo UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Didin Nuruddin Hidayat UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Alek Alek UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Keywords: Theme, Rheme, Progression, Diplomatic Text

Abstract

This study explores thematic progression patterns within the systemic functional linguistics (SFL) and the selection of words identified in writing within the diplomatic workplace. Politeness strategy employed between government to government communication through written diplomatic texts and its relationship with theme and rheme progression is the focus of this study. It is also aimed at raising host country EFL diplomat as well as university students’ awareness of progression patterns and the importance of persuasive writing to mitigate confrontational notions. Many researches have been conducted on public diplomacy and international relations on speeches or verbal texts but no studies on written text communication between a diplomatic office in a foreign country with the host country office announcing the arrival or departure of a diplomat from a foreign nation. To fill that gap is the reason of this study is aiming. A descriptive qualitative study was employed to analyze the theme-rheme progression patterns on a third-party-type diplomatic text of the Embassy of the United States of America addressed to the host country diplomatic consular section of the Department of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia in Jakarta.  SFL theory was applied particularly in analyzing the textual meta-function of the text to find the theme-rheme progression patterns. The result showed that the distribution of themes and rhemes in the text being analyzed follows the simple progression category.

Author Biographies

Rahardjo Rahardjo, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Rahardjo is a postgraduate student of Department of English Education, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Didin Nuruddin Hidayat, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Didin is a senior lecturer at Department of English Education, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Alek Alek, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Alek is a senior lecturer at Department of English Education, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

References

FAH-1 EXHIBIT H-612.2-5(A). (n.d.). Retrieved March 8, 2021, from https://fam.state.gov/fam/05fah01/05fah010610.html

FAH-1 EXHIBIT H-612.2-5(B). (n.d.). Retrieved March 8, 2021, from https://fam.state.gov/fam/05fah01/05fah010610.html

FAH-1 H-612.2-5 Note Diplomatique (CT:CH-4; 07-31-2002). (n.d.). Retrieved March 8, 2021, from https://fam.state.gov/fam/05fah01/05fah010610.html

FAH-1 H-612.2 Third-Person Notes (CT:CH-4; 07-31-2002). (n.d.). Retrieved March 8, 2021, from https://fam.state.gov/fam/05fah01/05fah010610.html

Bloor, T. (2004). The functional analysis of English. Hodder Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774854

Danes, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, 23, 106–128. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111676524.106

Danes, F. (2004). Universality vs. culture-specificity of emotion. In E. Weigand (Ed.), Emotion in Dialogic Interaction Advances in the Complex. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum International Publishing Group.

Fatmawati, D., Sinar, T. S., Ganie, R., & Yusuf, M. (2019). Thematic progression patterns of short story the black cat. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 3(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v3i1.1082

Firbas, J. (1992). Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge University Press.

Friedrich, P. (2016). World Englishes and peace linguistics: Their contribution to English for diplomatic purposes. In P. Friedrich (Ed.), English for Diplomatic Purposes. Short Run Press Ltd.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (Ed.); 3rd ed.). Routledge.

Herriman, J. (2011). Themes and theme progression in Swedish advanced learners’ writing in English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 1–28.

Hoek, J. (2018). Making sense of discourse. Gerd Stabler.

Ishihara, N. (2016). Softening or intensifying your language in oppositional talk: Disagreeing agreeably or defiantly. In P. Friedrich (Ed.), English for Diplomatic Purposes. Short Run Press Ltd.

Jing, W. (2015). Theme and thematic progression in English writing teaching. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(21), 178–187.

Linda, L., Maisa, M., & Mulatsih, D. (2017). The use of thematic progression in writing hortatory exposition text. Academic Journal Perspective : Education, Language, and Literature, 5(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v5i2.679

Liu, X., & Zhang, H. (2018). Discourse Analysis of the Victory Speech of President Trump from the Perspective of Theme and Thematic Progression Patterns. Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/emim-18.2018.56

McCabe-Hidalgo, A., & Belmonte, I. A. (1998). Theme-rheme patterns in L2 writing. Didáctica, 10, 13–31. https://doi.org/10.5209/DIDA.20673

Vienna convention on diplomatic relations, (1961). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843143055-31

Omenogor, H. D. (2019). The use of the passive voice for diplomatic and polite formal communications. Agbor Campus ANSU Journal of Language and Literary (AJILLS), 1(5), 73–84

Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse analysis: An introduction. Bloomsbury Academic.

Ridha, N. S. A. (2014). Theme and rheme: types and problems in EFL university students’ written texts. Journal of Basrah Researches (Humanities), 39(1), 92–114.

Shame, E. (2020). Choice of theme-rheme in political news reports in the Malawian English-language printed media. Journal of Humanity, 28(1), 49–71.

Shieh, C., & Lin, K. S. (2011). Thematic progression patterns and the texts of the department required english test. 15–34.

Soukhanov, A. H., & Ellis, K. (Eds.). (1984). Webster’s II New Riverside University Dictionary. Houghton Mifflin.

Thompson, S. A., Loveland, J. M., & Fombelle, P. W. (2014). Thematic discrepancy analysis: A method to gain insights into lurkers and test for non-response bias. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.06.001

Trevisan, P., & García, A. M. (2019). Systemic functional grammar as a tool for experimental stimulus design: New appliable horizons in psycholinguistics and neurolinguistics. Language Sciences, 75, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101237

Vasconcellos, M. (1992). The theme as message onset: Its structure and characteristics. Linguistics, 30(1), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1992.30.1.147

Wei, J. (2014). Theme and thematic progression in learner English: A literature review. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 16(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2014.1.a06

Article Metrics
Abstract views: 159
pdf downloads: 118
Published
2021-05-28
How to Cite
Rahardjo, R., Hidayat, D. N., & Alek, A. (2021). THEME AND RHEME ANALYSIS AND POLITENESS STRATEGY IN DIPLOMATIC WORKPLACE WRITING: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS. Getsempena English Education Journal , 8(1), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v8i1.1292
Section
Articles