CURRICULAR ALIGHMENT: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF CURRICULUM ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN FINAL EXAMINATIONS

  • Istiqomah Aprimargani Muliayu Ningsih Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • Ari Prasetyaningrum Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • Siti Maysuroh Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • Usuluddin Usuluddin Universitas Hamzanwadi
Keywords: Curriculum alignment, student performance, final exams

Abstract

This research examines the impact of curricular alignment on student performance in final exams. This research evaluates how much the match between the curriculum and the final exam influences student achievement. This research design uses a quantitative approach with 50 samples of grade-eleventh students at MA Mu’allimin NWDI Pancor, who follow an aligned and non-aligned curriculum. Data was collected through final exams and student perception surveys. Data analysis shows that students who follow an aligned curriculum obtain higher test scores compared to students who do not follow an aligned curriculum. The data collection revealed that the highest score was 78 and the lowest was 63. Out of the 25 pupils, 15 scored above 68, with an average score 68.6. Good curriculum alignment has been found to have a positive effect on exam scores. The majority of students’ assessed that the material taught was appropriate to the exam format and helped them understand the concept being tested. This research shows that curriculum alignment plays an important role in improving student performance on final exams, and is relevant in efforts to improve the overall quality of education.

References

Adler, R. H. (2022). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 38(4), 598–602.

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051

Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B., & Klusmann, U. (2022). Is empathy the key to effective teaching? A systematic review of its association with teacher-student interactions and student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1177–1216.

Alghamdy, R. Z. (2024). English Teachers’ Practice of Classroom Discourse in Light of Zone of Proximal Development Theory and Scaffolding Techniques. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1501.06

Algiovan, N., & Roza, A. S. (2020). English teaching materials during global pandemic: A survey on online learning at vocational schools in Lampung. Getsempena English Education Journal, 7(2), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v7i2.1180

Chian, M. M., Bridges, S. M., & Lo, E. (2019). The triple jump in problem-based learning: Unpacking principles and practices in designing assessment for curriculum alignment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1813

Fhonna, R. (2014). The correlation between mastering vocabulary and speaking ability (case study at SMA 10 Fajar Harapan Banda Aceh). Visipena, 5(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.46244/visipena.v5i1.234

Gregersen-Hermans, J. (2021). Toward a curriculum for the future: Synthesizing education for sustainable development and internationalization of the curriculum. Journal of Studies in International Education, 25(4), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153211031033

Hailikari, T., Virtanen, V., Vesalainen, M., & Postareff, L. (2022). Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421989160

Halim, N. (2019). Incorporating Genre Analysis in Teaching Writing. Getsempena English Education Journal, 6(1), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v6i1.872

Hamdoun, W. M. A. (2023). Constructive Alignment Approach: Enhancing Learning and Teaching. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0173.

Islam, W., Ahmad, S., & Islam, MD (2022). Investigating the Problems Faced by the University EFL Learners in Speaking English Language. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(2), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22223

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2024). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage publications.

Karanja, E. and Malone, L.C. (2021), "Improving project management curriculum by aligning course learning outcomes with Bloom’s taxonomy framework", Journal of International Education in Business, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 197-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-05-2020-0038.

Kumar, V., & Rewari, M. (2022). A responsible approach to higher education curriculum design. International Journal of Educational Reform, 31(4), 422–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 10567879221110509

Maysuroh, S., Wati, L., Dwimaulani, A., Yusri, N., & Sholihah, S. Z. (2022). An analysis on EFL learners’ perspectives of online learning during Covid-19 Pandemic. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.32332/joelt.v10i2.5249

Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), e3292.

Moşteanu, N. R. (2021). Teaching and learning techniques for the online environment. how to maintain students’ attention and achieve learning outcomes in a virtual environment using new technology. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 4(4), 278–290.

Prasetyaningrum, A., Asrobi, M., & Maysuroh, S. (2023). Grammar Learning Strategies Applied by English Foreign Language Students. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP, 10(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v10i1.7168

Qadir, J., Taha, A.-E. M., Yau, K.-L. A., Ponciano, J., Hussain, S., Al-Fuqaha, A., & Imran, M. A. (2020). Leveraging the force of formative assessment & feedback for effective engineering education.

Quinio, A. E., & Lam, T. C. (2021). Methods and biases in measuring change with self-reports. Basic Elements of Survey Research in Education: Addressing the Problems Your Advisor Never Told You About, 193–217.

Rahmi, R. (2014). The used of multimedia in english language teaching. Getsempena English Education Journal, 1(2), 64–79.

Rao, P. S. (2019). The role of English as a global language. Research Journal of English, 4(1), 65–79.

Shepard, L. A. (2019). Classroom assessment to support teaching and learning. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 183–200.

Shufutinsky, A. (2020). Employing use of self for transparency, rigor, trustworthiness, and credibility in qualitative organizational research methods. Organization Development Review, 52(1), 50–58.

Stahl, N. A., & King, J. R. (2020). Expanding approaches for research: Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(1), 26–28.

Sunkur, M. O., & Yilmaz, F. (n.d.). Prediction of Elementary School Teachers’ Curriculum Fidelity by Demographic Variables and Curriculum Literacy.

Uska, M. Z., Wirasasmita, R. H., Pathoni, B., Usuluddin, U., Kholisho, Y. N., & Abdullah, A. (2022). Aplikasi Belajar Asik Berbasis Android sebagai Media Pembelajaran Matematika. Educate: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 7(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.32832/educate.v7i2.7345

Wahyuni, S. (2019). STUDENTS’PERCEPTION ON LECTURER-STUDENT INTERACTION IN ENGLISH AS FOREIGN LANGUAGE (EFL) CLASSROOM. Getsempena English Education Journal, 6(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v6i1.867

Article Metrics
Abstract views: 66
PDF downloads: 57
Published
2024-05-31
How to Cite
Muliayu Ningsih, I. A., Prasetyaningrum, A., Maysuroh, S., & Usuluddin, U. (2024). CURRICULAR ALIGHMENT: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF CURRICULUM ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN FINAL EXAMINATIONS. Getsempena English Education Journal , 11(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v11i1.2750
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)