STRUCTURED MATHEMATICAL THINKING: EVALUATING POLYA’S PROBLEM-SOLVING APPROACH IN EXPONENT MULTIPLICATION AND DIVISION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v13i1.3507Keywords:
Polya’s problem-solving, quasi-experimental design, pretest–posttest, instructional intervention, problem-solving instruction, exponent reasoningAbstract
This study examines the effectiveness of Polya’s four-step problem-solving approach in strengthening students’ structured mathematical thinking when learning multiplication and division of exponents. Although exponent operations are fundamental in algebra, many Grade 7 students continue to experience difficulties in interpreting problem structures, applying exponent rules, and verifying their solutions. This research employed a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design involving 32 students at a junior secondary school. The instructional intervention applied Polya’s four phases: understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back. These phases were integrated into guided teaching activities and structured practice tasks. Data were collected through a ten-item test, an analytic scoring rubric, and an error analysis framework. The findings reveal a statistically significant improvement in students’ posttest performance when compared with the predetermined sixty percent competency benchmark. This indicates meaningful progress in both procedural fluency and structural reasoning. The error analysis also shows that students initially struggled with misinterpreting the structure of exponent expressions, inconsistent use of exponent laws, and limited monitoring of their own work. After the instructional intervention, most students demonstrated clearer reasoning patterns, more accurate translation of problem structures, and greater consistency in checking their answers. These results confirm that Polya’s four-step approach can support students in developing structured mathematical thinking by helping them express problem meaning, plan appropriate solution steps, and reflect on accuracy.
References
Avitzur, A. (2012). Exponentiation Is Not Repeated Multiplication: Developing Exponentiation as a Continuous Operation. North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Ayala, J. L. R., Pasaca, K. M. C., Cumbícus, M. F. O., Suquilanda, S. V. G., & Maza, R. I. A. (2024). Método Heurístico de Pólya como Estrategia Pedagógica para la Resolución de Problemas Matemáticos. Estudios y Perspectivas Revista Científica y Académica, 4(4), 2249-2265. https://doi.org/https://10.61384/r.c.a..v4i4.789
Biza, I. (2019). Calculus as a discursive bridge for Algebra, Geometry and Analysis: The case of tangent line. Calculus in upper secondary and beginning university mathematics.
Cañeda, M. (2024). Ensuring validity and reliability in Algebra midterm assessment: A comprehensive approach to test development and analysis.
Eccius-Wellmann, C. (2012). The need to know algebra skills, misconceptions, misapplications and weaknesses of students. China-USA Business Review, 11(9), 1256-1266.
Flynn, D., Hughes, J., & Robb, J. (2023). Improving Mathematics Learning Through Computational Participation. Journal Of Educational Informatics, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://10.51357/jei.v4i1.214
Gradini, E., Umar, A., Firmansyah, F., Effendi, Y., & Winardi, W. (2024). Fostering Higher Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics Learning: A Scoping Review of Teacher Development Initiatives. Unram Journal of Community Service, 5(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/https://10.29303/ujcs.v5i1.570
Gulam, A.-J. B., & Arenas, J. C. (2024). Mathematics Performance and Polya’s Method in Problem Solvin. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(3), 2156-2162. https://doi.org/https://10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2873
Hasan, A. (2024). Problem-Based Math Learning Strategies To Improve Students' Problem-Solving Skills. The Journal of Academic Science, 1(1), 22-26. https://doi.org/https://10.59613/rm65x686
Hughes, E. M., Riccomini, P. J., Lee, J.-Y., Cook, M. J., & Selfridge, K. A. (2024). Exploration of an SRSD writing strategy on students’ written expressions of math reasoning and sensemaking. The Elementary School Journal, 124(4), 513-541. https://doi.org/https://10.1086/730114
Jahudin, J., & Siew, N. M. (2024). The Effects of Polya's Problem Solving with Digital Bar Model on the Algebraic Thinking Skills of Seventh Graders. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(3), 390-409. https://doi.org/https://10.33225/pec/24.82.390
Kartono, K., & Sulhadi, S. (2019). Validity and reliability of higher order thinking skills (HOTS) test assessment in mathematics learning at seventh grade based on the expert study. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 8(2), 141-147.
Ningsih, S., & Hidayati, K. (2022). The role of abstraction ability in mathematical problem solving. AIP Conference Proceedings,
Nurtamam, M. E., & Jannah, A. N. (2025). A Systematic Qualitative Review of Teachers' Strategies in Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 9(2), 553-562. https://doi.org/https://10.31004/OBSESI.V9I2.6936
Oloruntegbe, K. O., Zamri, S. N. A. S., Saat, R. M., & Alam, G. M. (2010). Development and validation of measuring instruments of contextualization of science among Malaysian and Nigerian serving and pre-service chemistry teachers. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 5(13), 2075-2083. https://doi.org/https://10.5897/IJPS
Polya, G. (1962). Mathematical discovery, 1962. John Wiley & Sons.
Rufina, R. (2015). Using Reliability measures in Test Validation. Eur. Sci. J, 11(18), 369-377.
Sam, R. (2024). Systematic review of inquiry-based learning: assessing impact and best practices in education. F1000Research, 13, 1045. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155367.1
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). On paradigms and methods: What do you do when the ones you know don't do what you want them to? Issues in the analysis of data in the form of videotapes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 179-214.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). Mathematical problem solving. Elsevier.
Şenay, Ş. C. (2024). Analysis of misconceptions and errors regarding exponential and radical expressions through the theory of reducing abstraction. Research on Education and Psychology, 8(2), 281-295. https://doi.org/https://10.54535/rep.1520588
Syahfitri, N., & Wandini, R. R. (2023). Penerapan Teori Polya Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika di SD/MI. Konstanta: Jurnal Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 1(1), 54-60. https://doi.org/https://10.59581/konstanta.v1i1.2361
Torres-Peña, R. C., Peña-González, D., Lara-Orozco, J. L., Ariza, E. A., & Vergara, D. (2025). Enhancing Numerical Thinking Through Problem Solving: A Teaching Experience for Third-Grade Mathematics. Education Sciences, 15(6), 667. https://doi.org/https://10.3390/educsci15060667
Ulusoy, F. (2019). Serious Obstacles Hindering Middle School Students' Understanding of Integer Exponents. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(1), 52-69.
Wahab, A., Dasari, D., & Juandi, D. (2024). The Influence of the Use of Polya's Heuristic Strategies on Students' Mathematical Problem Solving: A Meta Analysis. JMLIPARE, 156-167.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access Authors who publish with Numeracy Journal agree to the following terms
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

.png)














